I would not describe liberal indoctrination through media, academia, and Hollywood as a three-pronged assault on democracy for at least two reasons: There is no indoctrination and there is no assault on democracy (in the ways that the claim implies). Professor Jonathan Haidt has recently been citing statistics, on several…

The short, and perhaps disappointing, answer is, “probably not.” Among the first things to understand is that Kant wished to account for our ability to know certain kinds of truths: synthetic a priori truths. That is philosopher’s talk for truths that are known before any observation is made, but whose…

To My Students at a Nearby Community College This course is pretty old school, and that is something I know a little about since I am near the end of a teaching career that began in 1978. I do not pretend to know much or anything about what is to…

Point of View Taxonomy Here is an algorithm to help you identify the point of view of a narrative text. Algorithm 1) Examine the text, excluding lines of dialogue spoken by the characters, for the pronouns used. 2) If the pronouns “I” or “we” are found, determine the degree of…

This is a difficult question to answer since we do not seem to have a satisfactory definition of knowledge itself. Plato makes a lengthy and systematic attempt to define knowledge in his Theaetetus, which some philosophers consider his greatest work. As with many of the Socratic dialogues, however, Theaetetus is…

Nearly everyone who cares about such things seems to know that Socrates claims not to know anything of value. However, one of the things that he claims that he does know is that true belief and knowledge are two different things: “I certainly do not think I am guessing that…

Occam’s razor has, for many, come to name an explanatory principle that holds that the simplest explanation for something is probably the right one. Such a principle is not really very helpful, if one is trying to account for the cosmos as we actually experience it because one could answer…

Descartes believes that the relation of implication produces indefeasible truths. In less philosophical terms, if it is true that I have two spoons, and it is true that I have two forks, then it must be true that I have four eating utensils (2+2=4). …